Scale‐Dependent Influence of Permafrost on Riverbank Erosion Rates
We analyzed 1,000s of km of riverbank erosion rates across the Arctic and assembled a global database of published erosion rates. We compared the bank erosion rates between permafrost and non-permafrost rivers to assess the impact of permafrost.
We found that on average, bank erosion rates for rivers with permafrost were 9 times lower than rivers without permafrost. The difference in erosion rates increases with the size of the river, with the largest permafrost rivers eroding riverbanks up to 40 times slower than similar non-permafrost rivers.
The rate rivers erode their banks controls the pace of migration and the impacts on neighboring communities and ecosystems. Erosion of floodplains releases sediment, carbon, and other constituents into rivers affecting the biogeochemistry of rivers and ultimately the coastal oceans into which rivers flow. Across the Arctic, rivers erode through floodplains frozen continuously for more than two years (permafrost). Before ice-bounded sediments can be eroded by flowing water they must be thawed. Using aerial photographs, satellite imagery, and direct field observations we found that permafrost slows the rate rivers erode their banks relative to rivers without permafrost. The effect of permafrost, however, varies with the size of the river, and the erosion rates of large rivers are disproportionately slowed by permafrost. As a result, permafrost thaw due to climate change will likely increase erosion rates on large rivers and have limited impact on small rivers, but very little data is available for small rivers in the Arctic highlighting a key data need.